When FORM applies to the limit state functions with same MPP, their failure probabilities are estimated as equal values. Figure 1 shows the linear and the nonlinear limit state functions with same MPP. But it is apparent that the failure probability of nonlinear limit state function() should be less than that of the linear limit state function (). In Figure 1, the shade areas are the failure regions, respectively.
Figure 1 Linear and Nonlinear Limit State with sample MPP
The curvature of the nonlinear limit state function is ignored in the FORM approach, which uses only a first-order approximation at MPFP. Thus, the second-order reliability method (SORM) was widely studied to include the curvature information. The SORM analysis requires a second-order polynomial:
This definition requires second order derivatives. Breitung derived the following asymptotic formula for large
where are the principal curvatures at the most probable failure point. Although SORM could improve the accuracy, it may become expensive if a large number of costly numerical analyses, such as large-scale CAE analyses embedded in the limit state functions, are involved.